Dec 29, 2025
The Cost of Slow: Why Your Expansion Revenue is Suffocating in Low Orbit
The Cost of Slow: Why Your Expansion Revenue is Suffocating in Low Orbit
I've been re-reading a lot of Andy Weir lately, so I thought I might take a swing at this topic as homage to him… Shout out to Rocky.
In orbital mechanics, there is no such thing as "slightly late." If you delay an engine burn by five seconds, you don't just miss your landing, you slingshot into the sun.
Revenue follows the same unforgiving physics. If your reps delay a follow-up by five days because they’re trapped in "Digital Archaeology," your expansion deal doesn't just slow down; it evaporates. Let's talk about the Cost of Slow.
The Expansion Half-Life
Expansion opportunities are like radioactive isotopes: they have a half-life. A usage spike is a signal now. A new stakeholder is a window this week.
According to research by InsideSales, the odds of entering a meaningful conversation drop by 10x if you wait just one hour to respond to a signal. In the B2B expansion world, we aren't talking about hours; we’re talking about the 5–7 business days it takes a rep to "prep" a deck.
By the time the slide looks pretty, the opportunity is cold.
The "Andy Weir" Revenue Math
Let’s look at the "Drag Coefficient" of your current team.
The Load: A rep with 40 accounts.
The Tax: Each account requires usage validation, stakeholder stalking, and manual slide formatting.
The Reality: Even a "quick" 45-minute prep cycle adds up to 30 hours of manual labor per month.
This isn't "work." It’s drag. And in space, as in SaaS, drag kills velocity.
The Velocity Formula:
Probability of Upsell = e ^ (-days * .15)
If you wait 14 days to act on a signal because your rep was "prepping," your conversion probability drops to roughly 12%. You aren't losing deals to competitors; you’re losing them to the calendar.
The Follow-Up Fallacy
We love to brag about "world-class relationships," but most teams actually practice "When I Find the Time" Follow-Up. Because follow-up requires context, notes, and assets, it becomes a mini-project. If a rep needs a full research cycle just to send a recap email, they won't do it. Not because they’re lazy, but because the system is built for delay. And in a high-growth environment, delay equals decay. ---
Stop Adding Astronauts; Fix the Oxygen
When expansion slows, most CROs misdiagnose the problem. They assume it's a "Capacity Issue" and hire more reps.
This is the business equivalent of adding more astronauts to a ship that’s running out of oxygen. It doesn't fix the trajectory; it just uses up the remaining air faster. The real lever isn't Headcount; it’s Cycle Time.
Manual Cycle: Signal detected $\rightarrow$ 3 days of research $\rightarrow$ 2 days of deck building $\rightarrow$ Meeting scheduled for next week. (Result: Dead on arrival).
Steerco Cycle: Signal detected $\rightarrow$ Insight validated $\rightarrow$ Prep automated $\rightarrow$ Conversation today. (Result: Orbit achieved).
The 2026 Mission Brief
If you want to increase revenue, stop looking for more people. Look for the "Manual Gunk" that is slowing your current team down.
Shave 80% off the manual work.
Automate the prep.
Compress the signal-to-action window.
In space, speed determines survival. In revenue, it determines your 2026 bonus. Don't run out of air before you run out of potential.
Stop the delay. Start the conversation. Systematize your velocity with Steerco.


